Advanced Search
Advanced Search
View: In situ

Statue of Venus (Louvre-Naples type), probably for a female portrait

Roman
Imperial Period
late 1st century to early 2nd century A.D.

Medium/Technique Marble from Carrara
Dimensions Overall: 150.5 x 58.4 x 53.3 cm, 426.38 kg (59 1/4 x 23 x 21 in., 940 lb.)
Credit Line Museum purchase as a memorial to Mrs. W. Scott Fitz with funds from the Henrietta Goddard Fitz Fund and Edward Jackson Holmes
Accession Number30.543
ClassificationsSculpture
This female figure belongs to a group of similar statues associated with Venus (the Greek Aphrodite), the goddess of love and the epitome of feminine sexuality. Her thin but voluminous tunic clings to the forms of her firm, rounded body, and as she raises her right hand (now missing) to adjust the mantle draped across her back, the tunic slips down seductively from her left shoulder and breast.

This style of dress, called "wet drapery," provided a means of revealing the body when a fully nude female statue was still unthinkable in Greek art. It appeared first on figures in the Parthenon's east pediment and became increasingly fashionable in the late fifth century B.C. The Romans adapted this manner for representations of Venus Genetrix, the mother of Aeneas and, as such, the ancestress of the Roman race and of the Julii, the family to which Julius Caesar and Augustus belonged. The political clout of the Julii in the late first century B.C. and the first century A.D. greatly enhanced the popularity of Venus Genetrix, who received a cult statue in Rome.

The same figure type was adapted for representations of mortal women, from empresses to ordinary ladies, in order to stress their Venus-like qualities-above all, fertility. It is likely that this statue once supported a portrait head with the individualized features of a Roman woman, perhaps showing signs of advanced age. Although modern viewers might find this combination jarring, the Romans were unconcerned about joining the head of an older woman to a youthful body, valuing symbolic significance over visual consistency.

Catalogue Raisonné Sculpture in Stone (MFA), no. 182; Sculpture in Stone and Bronze (MFA), p. 112 (additional published references); Highlights: Classical Art (MFA), p. 166.
DescriptionStanding, draped body of the Louvre-Naples type. The head and neck were made separately and inserted into the body. The right arm and shoulder were also made separately and attached with a large pin or clamp. Once holding up the himation, they are now missing, along with the left forearm and hand, which held an attribute such as an apple or pomegranate. The chiton, pinned at the right shoulder, and himation fall in a columnar fashion at the sides and back, and cling suggestively to the body in front. Since many copies do not have the chiton covering the left breast, this variation must have been introduced by copyists when the Venus body type was used for portraits, probably to satisfy the sitter's modesty. The feet wear sandals. The plinth is broken away in front of the right foot, and the drapery is chipped.
Some traces of pink pigments, particularly in the lower drapery, are still visible. The surfaces are encrusted and have a yellowish patina.

Scientific Analysis:
Harvard Lab No. HI755: Isotope ratios - delta13C +2.17 / delta18O -1.88, Attribution - Carrara, Justification - Fine grained marble.
ProvenanceSaid to have been found near Hadrian’s Villa, Tivoli [see note 1]. Before about 1930, shipped to Paris with the permission of the Italian government and subsequently returned to Italy [see note 2]. 1930, sold by Carlo M. Girard and Franklin Picciolo, Societa Anonima, ADAC, Ltd., Florence, to Edward Jackson Holmes on behalf of the MFA for $27,693. (Accession Date: August 7, 1930)
NOTES:
[1] According to a letter from J. D. Beazley to Edward Jackson Holmes (July 20, 1930).
[2] According to “Museum Acquires an Important Sculpture,” Boston Evening Transcript, October 4, 1930, p. 8, the sculpture was exported from Italy to a Parisian firm with approval of the Italian government, after an official had declared it to be an unimportant copy. It was later returned to Italy to dealers in Florence, where it was seen by Edward Jackson Holmes of the MFA.